FDR’s Folly


FDR's Folly: A Critical Examination of the New Deal
 

FDR's Folly, a controversial work penned by historian and economist Jim Powell, serves as a critical analysis of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal policies during the Great Depression. Published in 2003, Powell's book challenges the conventional narrative surrounding the New Deal, offering a provocative perspective on its impact and effectiveness.

Born out of the economic devastation of the 1930s, the New Deal was a series of sweeping reforms and programs initiated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to address the widespread unemployment, poverty, and financial instability gripping the United States. While many credit the New Deal with providing relief to millions of Americans and reshaping the nation's social and economic landscape, FDR's Folly takes a dissenting stance.

Powell argues that the New Deal, rather than being a panacea for the nation's economic woes, exacerbated the crisis and prolonged the recovery. He contends that FDR's policies, including increased government intervention, regulation, and public spending, hindered the natural processes of the market and discouraged business investment, ultimately impeding economic recovery.

The book challenges the effectiveness of New Deal programs such as the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), suggesting that they stifled competition, discouraged innovation, and contributed to economic stagnation. Powell also questions the wisdom of the New Deal's labor policies, arguing that they hindered job creation rather than facilitating it.

One of Powell's central contentions in FDR's Folly is that World War II, rather than the New Deal, was the catalyst for finally lifting the United States out of the Great Depression. He posits that the war effort mobilized the economy, created jobs, and spurred innovation in a way that the New Deal had failed to achieve.

While FDR's Folly has sparked debate and controversy, it is essential to recognize that it represents one perspective among many on the complex legacy of the New Deal. Roosevelt's policies continue to be a subject of historical analysis and interpretation, with scholars and historians offering a range of opinions on the effectiveness and consequences of the New Deal in shaping the trajectory of the United States during a tumultuous period in its history.

Would the Great Depression have been so catastrophic if the New Deal was never implemented? In FDR’s Folly historian Jim Powell argues that it was the New Deal that deepened the Great Depression & prevented the country from turning around quickly.





Comments